<aside> <img src="notion://custom_emoji/3c35a317-d438-469f-a88e-a21523d2b515/356011d7-387b-8007-b573-007a75f83db8" alt="notion://custom_emoji/3c35a317-d438-469f-a88e-a21523d2b515/356011d7-387b-8007-b573-007a75f83db8" width="40px" />
Story99.com is a Branding & Storytelling Consultancy for B2B, Tech & Deeptech
</aside>
People form an impression from how the company speaks, designs, sells, responds to problems, treats customers and makes decisions. Over time, these signals begin to suggest human traits: perhaps the company feels precise, warm, provocative, dependable, ambitious or inventive.
Brand personality is a way of making those traits explicit.
It is not a tagline, a visual style or a list of flattering adjectives. It is the character that should remain recognisable across different expressions of the company - from its website and campaigns to founder communication, customer experience, hiring and culture.
Without a shared understanding of the brand’s personality, different teams tend to make different assumptions.
One person may write as though the company is an authoritative expert. Another may make it sound like an energetic challenger. A designer may favour restraint while the sales team communicates with urgency. Each choice may work independently, but together they can create a brand that feels inconsistent or difficult to recognise.
A clearly defined personality gives people a common reference point. It helps them decide:
The Story99 Brand Personality Compass is a short individual exercise designed to surface the traits that feel most authentic to a company.
You will respond to a series of personality descriptions and gradually narrow your choices to a small final set. There are no universally correct answers. The useful answer is the one that reflects how the company genuinely behaves - or what it is seriously committed to becoming.
Try not to select a trait simply because it sounds impressive. Most companies cannot convincingly perform several different personalities at the same volume. Clarity requires choosing what should lead and allowing other traits to play supporting roles.
When several people from the same company complete the exercise separately, the similarities and disagreements become valuable.